Guías de la Difficult Airway Society (DAS) para el manejo de la intubación difícil no-anticipada en adultos.

Ricardo Urtubia Valenzuela

Texto completo:

HTML PDF

Resumen

Se trata de la versión en Español de las Guías que la DAS publicó a fines de 2015. Su impacto ha sido muy importante en todo el mundo. Dado que el manejo de la vía aérea es un aspecto fundamental en los cuidados críticos, es de la mayor importancia que su contenido sea difundido y conocido por los médicos involucrados con la Medicina Intensiva y Emergencias.

Palabras clave

vía aérea; vía aérea difícil; intubación; algoritmo;

Referencias

Referencias

Henderson JJ, Popat MT, Latto IP, Pearce AC. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for management of the unanticipated difficult intubation. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 675–94

4th National Audit Project of The Royal College of Anaesthetists and The Difficult Airway Society. Major complications of airway management in the United Kingdom, Report and Findings.

Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, 2011

Black AE, Flynn PER, Smith HL, Thomas ML, Wilkinson KA. Development of a guideline for the management of the unanticipated difficult airway in pediatric practice. Paediatr

Anaesth 2015; 25: 346–62

Mushambi MC, Kinsella SM, Popat M, et al. Obstetric Anaesthetists’

Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines

for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation

in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 1286–1306

Popat M, Mitchell V, Dravid R, Patel A, Swampillai C, Higgs A.Difficult Airway Society Guidelines for the management of

tracheal extubation. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 318–40

Hung O, Murphy M. Context-sensitive airway management.

Anesth Analg 2010; 110: 982–3

Weller JM, Merry AF, Robinson BJ, Warman GR, Janssen A.

The impact of trained assistance on error rates in anaesthesia:a simulation-based randomised controlled trial.

Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 126–30

Smith AF. Creating guidelines and treating patients when

there are no trials or systematic reviews. Eur J Anaesthesiol

; 30: 383–5

Flin R, Fioratou E, Frerk C, Trotter C, Cook TM. Human factors in the development of complications of airway management:preliminary evaluation of an interview tool.

Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 817–25

Reason J. Human error: models and management. Br Med J 2000; 320: 768–70

Stiegler MP, Neelankavil JP, Canales C, Dhillon A. Cognitive

errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and

pilot study. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 229–35

Greenland KB, Acott C, Segal R, Goulding G, Riley RH,

Merry AF. Emergency surgical airway in life-threatening

acute airway emergencies—why are we so reluctant to do

it? Anaesth Intensive Care 2011; 39: 578–84

Marshall S. The use of cognitive aids during emergencies in anesthesia: a reviewof the literature. Anesth Analg 2013; 117:1162–71

Chrimes N, Fritz P. The Vortex Approach 2013. Available

from http://vortexapproach.com/Vortex_Approach/Vortex.

html (accessed 18 May 2015)

ANZCA CPD Standards for Can’t Intubate Can’t Oxygenate

(CICO) education session. Available from http://www.anzca.

edu.au/fellows/continuing-professional-development/pdfs/

Appendix_12_CICO_Standard_131210.pdf (accessed 22 February 2015)

ANZCA Learning Objectives for CICO Course. Available from http://www.anzca.edu.au/fellows/continuing-professionaldevelopment/pdfs/emergency-response-activity-cico.pdf (accessed 22nd February 2015)

Frengley RW, Weller JM, Torrie J, et al. The effect of a simulation-based training intervention on the performance of established critical care unit teams. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 2605–11

Capella J, Smith S, Philp A, et al. Teamwork training improves the clinicalcareof traumapatients. J Surg Educ 2010; 67: 439–43

CaPS Clinical Governance Unit. Communication and Patient Safety Course notes. Available from https://www.health.qld. 840 | Frerk et al.

Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on February 7, 2016 gov.au/metrosouth/engagement/docs/caps-notes-a.pdf (accessed 22 July 2015)

Kheterpal S, Healy D, Aziz MF, et al. Incidence, predictors,

and outcome of difficult mask ventilation combined with

difficult laryngoscopy: a report from the multicenter perioperative outcomes group. Anesthesiology 2013; 119: 1360–9

Nørskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Wetterslev J, Astrup G,

Afshari A, Lundstrøm LH. Diagnostic accuracy of anaesthesiologists’ prediction of difficult airway management in daily clinical practice: a cohort study of 188 064 patients registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database. Anaesthesia

; 70: 272–81

Shiga T,Wajima Z, Inoue T, Sakamoto A. Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 429–37

Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety

checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global

population. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 491–9

Modified version of the WHO Checklist for UK 2009. Availablefrom http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/?entry

id45=59860 (accessed 30 May 2015)

Perry JJ, Lee JS, Sillberg VAH, Wells GA. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 16: CD002788

Sluga M, Ummenhofer W, Studer W, Siegemund M,

Marsch SC. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation: a prospective, randomized trial in emergent cases.

Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 1356–61

Karcioglu O, Arnold J, Topacoglu H, Ozucelik DN, Kiran S,

Sonmez N. Succinylcholine or rocuronium? A meta-analysis

of the effects on intubation conditions. Int J Clin Pract 2006;

: 1638–46

Mallon WK, Keim SM, Shoenberger JM, Walls RM. Rocuronium vs. succinylcholine in the emergency department: a critical appraisal. J Emerg Med 2009; 37: 183–8

Marsch SC, Steiner L, Bucher E, et al. Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2011; 15:R199

Sørensen MK, Bretlau C, Gätke MR, Sørensen AM,

Rasmussen LS. Rapid sequence induction and intubation

with rocuronium–sugammadex compared with succinylcholine: a randomized trial. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 682–9

Tang L, Li S, Huang S, Ma H,Wang Z. Desaturation following rapid sequence induction using succinylcholine vs. rocuronium in overweight patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011; 55: 203–8

Taha SK, El-Khatib MF, Baraka AS, et al. Effect of suxamethonium vs rocuronium on onset of oxygen desaturation during apnoea following rapid sequence induction. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 358–61

Curtis R, Lomax S, Patel B. Use of sugammadex in a ‘can’t

intubate, can’t ventilate’ situation. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108:

–4

Kyle BC, Gaylard D, Riley RH. A persistent ‘can’t intubate,

can’t oxygenate’ crisis despite rocuronium reversal with sugammadex. Anaesth Intensive Care 2012; 40: 344–6

Bisschops MMA, Holleman C, Huitink JM. Can sugammadex save a patient in a simulated ‘cannot intubate, cannot ventilate’ situation? Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 936–41

Lee C, Jahr JS, Candiotti KA, Warriner B, Zornow MH,

Naguib M. Reversal of profound neuromuscular block by

sugammadex administered three minutes after rocuronium:

a comparison with spontaneous recovery from succinylcholine.

Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 1020–5

Koerber JP, Roberts GEW, Whitaker R, Thorpe CM. Variation in rapid sequence induction techniques: current practice in Wales. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 54–9

Salem MR, Sellick BA, Elam JO. The historical background of cricoid pressure in anesthesia and resuscitation. Anesth

Analg 1974; 53: 230–2

Sellick BA. Cricoid pressure to control regurgitation of stomach contents during induction of anaesthesia. Lancet 1961; 2: 404–6

Hartsilver EL, Vanner RG. Airway obstruction with cricoid

pressure. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 208–11

Vanner RG, Asai T. Safe use of cricoid pressure. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 1–3

Vanner R. Techniques of cricoid pressure. Anaesth Intensive Care Med 2001; 2: 362–3

Tournadre JP, Chassard D, Berrada KR, Boulétreau P. Cricoid cartilage pressure decreases lower esophageal sphincter tone. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 7–9

Salem MR, BruningaKW, Dodlapatii J, Joseph NJ. Metoclopramide does not attenuate cricoid pressure-induced relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter in awake volunteers. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 806–10

Vanner RG, Clarke P, Moore WJ, Raftery S. The effect of cricoid pressure and neck support on the viewat laryngoscopy.

Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 896–900

Meek T, Gittins N, Duggan JE. Cricoid pressure: knowledge

and performance amongst anaesthetic assistants. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 59–62

Palmer JHM, Ball DR. The effect of cricoid pressure on the cricoid cartilage and vocal cords: an endoscopic study in anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 263–8

Shorten GD, Alfille PH, Gliklich RE. Airway obstruction following application of cricoid pressure. J Clin Anesth 1991; 3: 403–5

Ansermino JM, Blogg CE. Cricoid pressure may prevent insertion of the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69: 465–7

Aoyama K, Takenaka I, Sata T, Shigematsu A. Cricoid pressure impedes positioning and ventilation through the laryngeal mask airway. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43: 1035–40

Hocking G, Roberts FL, Thew ME. Airway obstruction with

cricoid pressure and lateral tilt. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 825–8

Allman KG. The effect of cricoid pressure application on airway patency. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 197–9

Warters RD, Szabo T, Spinale FG, Desantis SM, Reves JG. The effect of neuromuscular blockade on mask ventilation.

Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 163–7

Sachdeva R, Kannan TR, Mendonca C, Patteril M. Evaluation of changes in tidal volume during mask ventilation following administration of neuromuscular blocking drugs.

Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 826–31

Connelly NR, Ghandour K, Robbins L, Dunn S, Gibson C. Management of unexpected difficult airway at a teaching

institution over a 7-year period. J Clin Anesth 2006; 18: 198–204

Sakles JC, Chiu S, Mosier J,Walker C, Stolz U. The importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2013;20: 71–8

Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Posner KL, Lee LA,

Cheney FW. Management of the difficult airway: a closed

claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 33–9

Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines | 841

Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on February 7, 2016

El-Orbany M,Woehlck H, Salem MR. Head and neck position for direct laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 103–9

Adnet F, Baillard C, BorronSW, et al. Randomized study comparing the ‘sniffing position’ with simple head extension for laryngoscopic view in elective surgery patients. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 836–41

Magill IW. Technique in endotracheal anaesthesia. Br Med J 1930; 2: 817–9

Collins JS, Lemmens HJM, Brodsky JB, Brock-Utne JG,

Levitan RM. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison

of the ‘sniff’ and ‘ramped’ positions. Obes Surg 2004; 14: 1171–5

Murphy C,Wong DT. Airway management and oxygenation

in obese patients. Can J Anaesth 2013; 60: 929–45

Ranieri D, Filho SM, Batista S, Do Nascimento P. Comparison of Macintosh and AirtraqTM laryngoscopes in obese patients placed in the ramped position. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 980–5

Rao SL, Kunselman AR, Schuler HG, Desharnais S. Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in the head-elevated position in obese patients: a randomized, controlled, equivalence trial. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 1912–8

Weingart SD, Levitan RM. Preoxygenation and prevention of desaturation during emergency airway management. Ann

Emerg Med. 2012; 59: 165–75

Cattano D, Melnikov V, Khalil Y, Sridhar S, Hagberg CA. An

evaluation of the rapid airway management positioner in

obese patients undergoing gastric bypass or laparoscopic

gastric banding surgery. Obes Surg 2010; 20: 1436–41

Bell MDD. Routine pre-oxygenation – a new ‘minimum

standard’ of care? Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 943–5

McGowan P, Skinner A. Preoxygenation—the importance of

a good face mask seal. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 777–8

Tanoubi I, Drolet P, Donati F. Optimizing preoxygenation in

adults. Can J Anaesth 2009; 56: 449–66

Nimmagadda U, Chiravuri SD, Salem MR, et al. Preoxygenation

with tidal volume and deep breathing techniques: the

impact of duration of breathing and fresh gas flow. Anesth

Analg 2001; 92: 1337–41

Pandey M, Ursekar R, Aphale S. Three minute tidal breathing

– a gold standard techniques for pre-oxygenation for elective

surgeries. Innov J Med Health Sci 2014; 4: 194–7

Pandit JJ, Duncan T, Robbins PA. Total oxygen uptake with

two maximal breathing techniques and the tidal volume

breathing technique: a physiologic study of preoxygenation.

Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 841–6

Russell EC, Wrench I, Feast M, Mohammed F. Pre-oxygenation

in pregnancy: the effect of fresh gas flow rates within

a circle breathing system. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 833–6

Taha SK, El-Khatib MF, Siddik-Sayyid SM, et al. Preoxygenation

by 8 deep breaths in 60 seconds using the Mapleson A

(Magill), the circle system, or the Mapleson D system. J Clin

Anesth 2009; 21: 574–8

Baraka AS, Taha SK, Aouad MT, El-Khatib MF, Kawkabani NI. Preoxygenation: comparison of maximal breathing and tidal volume breathing techniques. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 612–6

Drummond GB, Park GR. Arterial oxygen saturation before

intubation of the trachea. An assessment of oxygenation

techniques. Br J Anaesth 1984; 56: 987–93

Hirsch J, Führer I, Kuhly P, SchaffartzikW. Preoxygenation: a comparison of three different breathing systems. Br J

Anaesth 2001; 87: 928–31

Nimmagadda U, Salem MR, Joseph NJ, Miko I. Efficacy of preoxygenation using tidal volume and deep breathing

techniques with and without prior maximal exhalation.

Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 448–52

Gagnon C, Fortier L-P, Donati F. When a leak is unavoidable, preoxygenation is equally ineffective with vital capacity or tidal volume breathing. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53: 86–91

Dixon BJ, Dixon JB, Carden JR, et al. Preoxygenation is more effective in the 25 degrees head-up position than in the supine position in severely obese patients: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology 2005; 102: 1110–5

Lane S, Saunders D, Schofield A, Padmanabhan R,

Hildreth A, Laws D. A prospective, randomised controlled

trial comparing the efficacy of pre-oxygenation in the 20 degrees head-up vs supine position. Anaesthesia 2005; 60:

–7

Cressey DM, Berthoud MC, Reilly CS. Effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure to enhance pre-oxygenation in morbidly obese women. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 680–4

Gander S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L.

Positive end-expiratory pressure during induction of general

anesthesia increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 580–4

Herriger A, Frascarolo P, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. The effect of positive airway pressure during pre-oxygenation and induction of anaesthesia upon duration of non-hypoxic apnoea. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 243–7

Taha SK, Siddik-Sayyid SM, El-Khatib MF, Dagher CM,

Hakki MA, Baraka AS. Nasopharyngeal oxygen insufflation

following pre-oxygenation using the four deep breath technique. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 427–30

Ramachandran SK, Cosnowski A, Shanks A, Turner CR. Apneic oxygenation during prolonged laryngoscopy in obese

patients: a randomized, controlled trial of nasal oxygen administration. J Clin Anesth 2010; 22: 164–8

Levitan RM. NO DESAT! Nasal Oxygen During Efforts Securing A Tube 2010. Available from http://www.airwaycam.

com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/NO-DESAT.pdf (acccessed

April 2015)

Patel A, Nouraei SA. Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE): a physiological method of increasing apnoea time in patients with difficult airways. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 323–9

Miguel-Montanes R, Hajage D, Messika J, et al. Use of highflow nasal cannula oxygen therapy to prevent desaturation during tracheal intubation of intensive care patients with mild-to-moderate hypoxemia. Crit Care Med 2015; 43: 574–83

Vourc’h M, Asfar P, Volteau C, et al. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen during endotracheal intubation in hypoxemic patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Intensive Care

Med 2015; 41: 1538–48

Brown GW, Ellis FR. Comparison of propofol and increased

doses of thiopentone for laryngeal mask insertion. Acta

Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 1103–4

Ti LK, Chow MY, Lee TL. Comparison of sevoflurane with

propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults.

Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 908–12

Sury MRJ, Palmer JHMG, Cook TM, Pandit JJ. The State of UK anaesthesia: a survey of National Health Service activity in

Br J Anaesth 2014; 113: 575–84

MacG Palmer J, Pandit JJ. AAGA during induction of anaesthesia and transfer into theatre. In: Pandit JJ, Cook TM, eds. 5th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. London: Accidental Awareness during General Anaesthesia in the United Kingdom and Ireland, 2014; 63–76 842 | Frerk et al.

Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on February 7, 2016

Broomhead RH, Marks RJ, Ayton P. Confirmation of the ability to ventilate by facemask before administration of neuromuscular blocker: a non-instrumental piece of information? Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 313–7

Calder I, Yentis SM. Could ‘safe practice’ be compromising

safe practice? Should anaesthetists have to demonstrate

that face mask ventilation is possible before giving a neuromuscular blocker? Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 113–5

Chambers D, Paulden M, Paton F, et al. Sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular block after rapid sequence intubation: a systematic review and economic assessment. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: 568–75

Reddy JI, Cooke PJ, van Schalkwyk JM, Hannam JA,

Fitzharris P, Mitchell SJ. Anaphylaxis is more common

with rocuronium and succinylcholine than with atracurium.

Anesthesiology 2015; 122: 39–45

Sadleir PHM, Clarke RC, Bunning DL, Platt PR. Anaphylaxis to

neuromuscular blocking drugs: incidence and cross-reactivity

inWestern Australia from 2002 to 2011. Br J Anaesth 2013;

: 981–7

Von Goedecke A, Voelckel WG, Wenzel V, et al. Mechanical

versus manual ventilation via a face mask during the induction

of anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, crossover

study. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 260–3

Isono S, Tanaka A, Ishikawa T, Tagaito Y, Nishino T. Sniffing

position improves pharyngeal airway patency in anesthetized

patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology

; 103: 489–94

El-Orbany M,Woehlck HJ. Difficult mask ventilation. Anesth

Analg 2009; 109: 1870–80

Ramachandran SK, Kheterpal S. Difficult mask ventilation:

does it matter? Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 40–4

Niforopoulou P, Pantazopoulos I, Demestiha T, Koudouna E,

Xanthos T. Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management:

a topical review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol

Scand 2010; 54: 1050–61

Griesdale DEG, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope®

video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal

intubation: a systematic reviewand meta-analysis.

Can J Anaesth 2012; 59: 41–52

Andersen LH, Rovsing L, Olsen KS. GlideScope videolaryngoscope

vs. Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation

of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial. Acta

Anaesthesiol Scand 2011; 55: 1090–7

Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, Cooper RM. Cardiothoracic

anesthesia, respiration and airway; early clinical experience

with a newvideolaryngoscope (GlideScope®) in 728 patients.

Can J Anaesth 2005; 52: 191–8

Thong SY, Lim Y. Video and optic laryngoscopy assisted tracheal

intubation—the new era. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009;

: 219–33

Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, Brambrink AM. Comparative effectiveness

of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct

laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.

Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 629–36

Mosier JM, Whitmore SP, Bloom JW, et al. Video laryngoscopy

improves intubation success and reduces esophageal intubations

compared to direct laryngoscopy in the medical intensive

care unit. Crit Care 2013; 17: R237

Asai T, Liu EH, Matsumoto S, et al. Use of the Pentax-AWS in

patients with difficult airways. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:

–904

Cavus E, Neumann T, Doerges V, et al. First clinical evaluation

of the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope during

routine and difficult intubation. Anesth Analg 2011; 112:

–5

Jungbauer A, Schumann M, Brunkhorst V, Börgers A,

Groeben H. Expected difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective

comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video

laryngoscopy in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 546–50

Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and

maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related

domains. Acad Med 2004; 79: S70–81

Zaouter C, Calderon J, Hemmerling TM. Videolaryngoscopy

as a new standard of care. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114: 181–3

Kok T, George RB, McKeen D, Vakharia N, Pink A. Effectiveness

and safety of the Levitan FPS ScopeTM for tracheal intubation

under general anesthesia with a simulated

difficult airway. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59: 743–50

Aziz M, Metz S. Clinical evaluation of the Levitan Optical

Stylet. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 579–81

Bein B, Yan M, Tonner PH, Scholz J, Steinfath M, Dörges V. Tracheal intubation using the Bonfils intubation fibrescope

after failed direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 1207–9

Byhahn C, Nemetz S, Breitkreutz R, Zwissler B, Kaufmann M, Meininger D. Brief report: tracheal intubation using the Bonfils intubation fibrescope or direct laryngoscopy for patients with a simulated difficult airway. Can J Anaesth 2008; 55: 232–7

Thong SY,Wong TG. Clinical uses of the Bonfils Retromolar Intubation Fiberscope: a review. Anesth Analg 2012; 115: 855–66

Webb A, Kolawole H, Leong S, Loughnan TE, Crofts T,

Bowden C. Comparison of the Bonfils and Levitan optical

stylets for tracheal intubation: a clinical study. Anaesth

Intensive Care 2011; 39: 1093–7

Phua DS, Mah CL,Wang CF. The Shikani optical stylet as an

alternative to the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope in simulated

difficult intubations—a randomised controlled trial.

Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 402–6

Koh KF, Hare JD, Calder I. Small tubes revisited. Anaesthesia

; 53: 46–50

Marfin AG, Iqbal R, Mihm F, Popat MT, Scott SH, Pandit JJ.

Determination of the site of tracheal tube impingement

during nasotracheal fibreoptic intubation. Anaesthesia

; 61: 646–50

Jackson AH, Orr B, Yeo C, Parker C, Craven R, Greenberg SL.

Multiple sites of impingement of a tracheal tube as it is advanced

over a fibreoptic bronchoscope or tracheal tube

introducer in anaesthetized, paralysed patients. Anaesth

Intensive Care 2006; 34: 444–9

Jafari A, Gharaei B, Kamranmanesh MR, et al.Wire reinforced

endotracheal tube compared with Parker Flex-Tip tube for

oral fiberoptic intubation: a randomized clinical trial.

Minerva Anestesiol 2014; 80: 324–9

Heidegger T. Videos in clinical medicine. Fiberoptic intubation.

N Engl J Med 2011; 364: e42

Barker KF, Bolton P, Cole S, Coe PA. Ease of laryngeal passage

during fibreoptic intubation: a comparison of three endotracheal

tubes. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 624–6

Dogra S, Falconer R, Latto IP. Successful difficult intubation.

Tracheal tube placement over a gum-elastic bougie.

Anaesthesia 1990; 45: 774–6

Brull SJ, Wiklund R, Ferris C, Connelly NR, Ehrenwerth J,

Silverman DG. Facilitation of fiberoptic orotracheal intubation

with a flexible tracheal tube. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 746–8

Kristensen MS. The Parker Flex-Tip tube versus a standard

tube for fiberoptic orotracheal intubation: a randomized

double-blind study. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 354–8

Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines | 843

Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on February 7, 2016

Suzuki A, Tampo A, Abe N, et al. The Parker Flex-Tip tracheal

tube makes endotracheal intubation with the Bullard laryngoscope

easier and faster. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25: 43–7

Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated

with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth

Analg 2004; 99: 607–13

Hasegawa K, Shigemitsu K, Hagiwara Y, et al. Association between

repeated intubation attempts and adverse events in

emergency departments: an analysis of a multicenter prospective

observational study. Ann Emerg Med 2012; 60:

–54

Martin LD, Mhyre JM, Shanks AM, Tremper KK, Kheterpal S.

,423 emergency tracheal intubations at a university hospital:

airway outcomes and complications. Anesthesiology

; 114: 42–8

Griesdale DEG, Bosma TL, Kurth T, Isac G, Chittock DR. Complications

of endotracheal intubation in the critically ill.

Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 1835–42

Schmitt HJ, Mang H. Head and neck elevation beyond the

sniffing position improves laryngeal view in cases of difficult

direct laryngoscopy. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 335–8

Knill RL. Difficult laryngoscopy made easy with a ‘BURP’. Can

J Anaesth 1993; 40: 279–82

Relle A. Difficult laryngoscopy—“BURP”. Can J Anaesth 1993;

: 798–9

Lam AM. The difficult airway and BURP — a truly Canadian

perspective. Can J Anaesth 1999; 46: 298–9

Benumof JL. Difficult laryngoscopy: obtaining the best view.

Can J Anaesth 1994; 41: 361–5

Levitan RM, Mickler T, Hollander JE. Bimanual laryngoscopy:

a videographic study of external laryngeal manipulation by

novice intubators. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 40: 30–7

KaplanMB,Ward DS, Berci G. A newvideo laryngoscope—an aid to intubation and teaching. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 620–6

Murphy MF, Hung OR, Law JA. Tracheal intubation: tricks ofthe trade. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2008; 26: 1001–14

Latto IP, Stacey M, Mecklenburgh J, Vaughan RS. Survey of

the use of the gum elastic bougie in clinical practice.

Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 379–84

Jabre P, Combes X, Leroux B, et al. Use of gum elastic bougie

for prehospital difficult intubation. Am J Emerg Med 2005; 23:

–5

Hodzovic I,Wilkes AR, Latto IP. To shape or not to shape simulated bougie-assisted difficult intubation in a manikin.

Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 792–7

Kelly FE, Seller C. Snail trail. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 501

Takenaka I, Aoyama K, Iwagaki T, Ishimura H, Takenaka Y, Kadoya T. Approach combining the Airway Scope and the

bougie for minimizing movement of the cervical spine during

endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:

–40

Rai MR. The humble bougie . . . forty years and still counting?

Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 199–203

Cook TM. A new practical classification of laryngeal view.

Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 274–9

Yentis SM, Lee DJ. Evaluation of an improved scoring system

for the grading of direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1998; 53:

–4

Marson BA, Anderson E, Wilkes AR, Hodzovic I. Bougie-related

airway trauma: dangers of the hold-up sign.

Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 219–23

Arndt GA, Cambray AJ, Tomasson J. Intubation bougie dissection

of tracheal mucosa and intratracheal airway obstruction.

Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 603–4

Evans H, Hodzovic I, Latto IP. Tracheal tube introducers:

choose and use with care. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 859

Kidd JF, Dyson A, Latto IP. Successful difficult intubation. Use of the gum elastic bougie. Anaesthesia 1988; 43: 437–8

Batra R, Dhir R, Sharma S, Kumar K. Inadvertent pneumothorax

caused by intubating bougie. J Anaesthesiol Clin

Pharmacol 2015; 31: 271

Staikou C, Mani AA, Fassoulaki AG. Airway injury caused by

a Portex single-use bougie. J Clin Anesth 2009; 21: 616–7

Simpson JA, Duffy M. Airway injury and haemorrhage associated with the Frova intubating introducer. J Intensive Care Soc 2012; 13: 151–4

Turkstra TP, Harle CC, Armstrong KP, et al. The GlideScopespecific rigid stylet and standard malleable stylet are equally effective for GlideScope use. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 891–6

Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical

experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in

patients. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52: 191–8

Batuwitage B, McDonald A, Nishikawa K, Lythgoe D,

Mercer S, Charters P. Comparison between bougies and

stylets for simulated tracheal intubation with the C-MAC

D-blade videolaryngoscope. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015; 32: 400–5

Cooper RM. Complications associated with the use of the

GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 54–7

Cross P, Cytryn J, Cheng KK. Perforation of the soft palate

using the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anaesth

; 54: 588–9

Amundson AW, Weingarten TN. Traumatic GlideScope®

video laryngoscopy resulting in perforation of the soft palate.

Can J Anaesth 2013; 60: 210–1

Choo MKF, Yeo VST, See JJ. Another complication associated

with videolaryngoscopy. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 322–4

Dupanovic M. Maneuvers to prevent oropharyngeal injury

during orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope video laryngoscope.

J Clin Anesth 2010; 22: 152–4

AAGBI Recommendations for standards of monitoring during

anaesthesia and recovery 2007 (4th Edn). Available from

www.aagbi.org/sites/default/files/standardsofmonitoring

pdf (accessed 24 May 2011)

Petrini F, Accorsi A, Adrario E, et al. Recommendations for

airway control and difficult airway management. Minerva

Anestesiol 2005; 71: 617–57

Kristensen MS. Ultrasonography in the management of the

airway. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011; 55: 1155–73

Kristensen MS, Teoh WH, Graumann O, Laursen CB. Ultrasonography

for clinical decision-making and intervention

in airway management: from the mouth to the lungs and

pleurae. Insights Imaging 2014; 5: 253–79

Davies PRF, Tighe SQM, Greenslade GL, Evans GH. Laryngeal

mask airway and tracheal tube insertion by unskilled personnel.

Lancet 1990; 336: 977–9

Muller NV, Alberts AA. Unique™Laryngeal Mask airway versus

Cobra™ Perilaryngeal airway: learning curves for insertion.

South Afr J Anaesth Analg 2014; 12: 21

Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Cebrian J, Arranz J. Laryngeal

mask airway in pediatric practice: a prospective study of

skill acquisition by anesthesia residents. Anesthesiology

; 84: 807–11

Brimacombe J. Analysis of 1500 laryngeal mask uses by one

anaesthetist in adults undergoing routine anaesthesia.

Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 76–80

Greaves JD. Training time and consultant practice. Br J

Anaesth 2005; 95: 581–3

| Frerk et al.

Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on February 7, 2016

Asai T, Barclay K, Power I, Vaughan RS. Cricoid pressure and

the LMA: efficacy and interpretation. Br J Anaesth 1994; 73:

–4

Brimacombe J. Difficult Airway. In: Brimacombe J, ed.

Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia Principles and Practice, 2nd Edn.

Philadelphia: Saunders, 2005; 305–56

Hashimoto Y, Asai T, Arai T, Okuda Y. Effect of cricoid pressure

on placement of the I-gel™: a randomised study.

Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 878–82

Asai T, Goy RWL, Liu EHC. Cricoid pressure prevents placement

of the laryngeal tube and laryngeal tube-suction II.

Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 282–5

Li CW, Xue FS, Xu YC, et al. Cricoid pressure impedes insertion

of, and ventilation through, the ProSeal laryngeal mask

airway in anesthetized, paralyzed patients. Anesth Analg

; 104: 1195–8

Cook TM, Kelly FE. Time to abandon the ‘vintage’ laryngeal

mask airway and adopt second-generation supraglottic airway

devices as first choice. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115: 497–9

Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA ‘ProSeal’—a laryngeal

mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84:

–4

Levitan RM, Kinkle WC. Initial anatomic investigations of

the I-gel airway: a novel supraglottic airway without inflatable

cuff. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 1022–6

Van Zundert A, Brimacombe J. The LMA Supreme™—a pilot

study. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 209–10

Tiefenthaler W, Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Fricke E,

Keller C, Kaufmann M. A randomised, non-crossover study

of the GuardianCPV™ Laryngeal Mask versus the LMA Supreme

™ in paralysed, anaesthetised female patients.

Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 600–4

Miller DM, Lavelle M. A streamlined pharynx airway liner: a

pilot study in 22 patients in controlled and spontaneous

ventilation. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 759–61

Youssef MMI, Lofty M, Hammad Y, Elmenshawy E. Comparative

study between LMA-Proseal™ and Air-Q® Blocker

for ventilation in adult eye trauma patients. Egypt J

Anaesth 2014; 30: 227–33

Alexiev V, Salim A, Kevin LG, Laffey JG. An observational

study of the Baska® mask: a novel supraglottic airway.

Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 640–5

Lopez Sala-Blanch X, Valero R, Prats AA. Cross-over assessment

of the AmbuAuraGain, LMA SupremeNewCuff and Intersurgical

I-Gel in fresh cadavers. Open J Anesthesiol 2014; 4:

–9

Mihai R, Knottenbelt G, Cook TM. Evaluation of the revised

laryngeal tube suction: the laryngeal tube suction II in 100

patients. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 734–9

Theiler L, Gutzmann M, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Urwyler N,

Kaempfen B, Greif R. i-gel™ supraglottic airway in clinical

practice: a prospective observational multicentre study. Br

J Anaesth 2012; 109: 990–5

Cook TM, Gibbison B. Analysis of 1000 consecutive uses of

the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway by one anaesthetist at a

district general hospital. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 436–9

GoldmannK, Hechtfischer C,Malik A,Kussin A, Freisburger C.

Use of ProSeal™laryngealmask airway in 2114 adult patients:

a prospective study. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 1856–61

Yao WY, Li SY, Sng BL, Lim Y, Sia AT. The LMA Supreme™in

parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery: an observational

study. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59: 648–54

Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway:

a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52: 739–60

De Montblanc J, Ruscio L, Mazoit JX, Benhamou D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the i-gel® vs laryngeal mask airway in adults. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 1151–62

Maitra S, Khanna P, Baidya DK. Comparison of laryngeal

mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Pro-Seal

for controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia in

adult patients: systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J

Anaesthesiol 2014; 31: 266–73

Park SK, Choi GJ, Choi YS, Ahn EJ, Kang H. Comparison of the

i-gel and the laryngeal mask airway proseal during general

anesthesia: a systematic reviewand meta-analysis. PLoS One

; 10: e0119469

Chen X, Jiao J, Cong X, Liu L, Wu X. A comparison of the performance

of the I-gel™vs. the LMA-S™during anesthesia: a

meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One

; 8: e71910

López AM, Valero R, Hurtado P, Gambús P, Pons M,

Anglada T. Comparison of the LMA Supreme™ with the

LMA Proseal™ for airway management in patients anaesthetized

in prone position. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 265–71

Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, et al. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal

mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway Pro-

Seal: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;

: 602–7

Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, Tekin M, Toker K, Solak M.

A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-Supreme™, comparison

with LMA-Proseal™. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009;

: 852–7

Lee AKY, Tey JBL, Lim Y, Sia ATH. Comparison of the singleuse

LMA Supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia

in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth

Intensive Care 2009; 37: 815–9

Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C. The

Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™—a single use laryngeal

mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised,

cross-over study with the Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal™

in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64:

–83

Singh I, Gupta M, Tandon M. Comparison of clinical performance

of I-gel with LMA-ProSeal in elective surgeries.

Indian J Anaesth 2009; 53: 302–5

Chauhan G, Nayar P, Seth A, Gupta K, Panwar M, Agrawal N.

Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA

Proseal. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2013; 29: 56–60

Mukadder S, Zekine B, Erdogan KG, et al. Comparison of the

proseal, supreme, and i-gel SAD in gynecological laparoscopic

surgeries. Scientific World J 2015; 2015: 634320

Schmidbauer W, Bercker S, Volk T, Bogusch G, Mager G,

Kerner T. Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway

device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask

airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model. Br

J Anaesth 2009; 102: 135–9

Schmidbauer W, Genzwürker H, Ahlers O, Proquitte H,

Kerner T. Cadaver study of oesophageal insufflation with

supraglottic airway devices during positive pressure ventilation

in an obstructed airway. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 454–8

Russo SG, Cremer S, Galli T, et al. Randomized comparison of

the i-gel™, the LMA Supreme™, and the Laryngeal Tube

Suction-Dusing clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective

patients. BMC Anesthesiol 2012; 12: 18

Shin W-J, Cheong Y-S, Yang H-S, Nishiyama T. The supraglottic

airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal

mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized

patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 598–601

Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines | 845

Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on February 7, 2016

Teoh WHL, Lee KM, Suhitharan T, Yahaya Z, Teo MM,

Sia ATH. Comparison of the LMA Supreme vs the i-gel™ in

paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic

surgery with controlled ventilation. Anaesthesia 2010; 65:

–9

Ragazzi R, Finessi L, Farinelli I, Alvisi R, Volta CA. LMA Supreme

™ vs i-gel™—a comparison of insertion success in

novices. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 384–8

Kang F, Li J, Chai X, Yu J-G, Zhang H-M, Tang C-L. Comparison

of the I-gel laryngeal mask airway with the LMASupreme

for airway management in patients undergoing

elective lumbar vertebral surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol

; 27: 37–41

Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, et al. Crossover

comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel

in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients.

Anesthesiology 2009; 111: 55–62

Pajiyar AK,Wen Z,Wang H, Ma L, Miao L,Wang G. Comparisons

of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask

with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal. BMC Anesthesiol 2015;

: 69

Genzwuerker HV, Altmayer S, Hinkelbein J, Gernoth C,

Viergutz T, Ocker H. Prospective randomized comparison

of the new Laryngeal Tube Suction LTS II and the LMA-Pro-

Seal for elective surgical interventions. Acta Anaesthesiol

Scand 2007; 51: 1373–7

Jeon WJ, Cho SY, Baek SJ, Kim KH. Comparison of the Proseal

LMA and intersurgical I-gel during gynecological laparoscopy.

Korean J Anesthesiol 2012; 63: 510–4

Sharma B, Sehgal R, Sahai C, Sood J. PLMA vs. I-gel: a

comparative evaluation of respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic

cholecystectomy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2010;

: 451–7

Van Zundert TCRV, Brimacombe JR. Similar oropharyngeal

leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal

and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg

; 63: 35–41

Chew EEF, Hashim NHM, Wang CY. Randomised comparison

of the LMA Supreme with the I-Gel in spontaneously

breathing anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesth Intensive

Care 2010; 38: 1018–22

Joly N, Poulin L-P, Tanoubi I, Drolet P, Donati F, St-Pierre P.

Randomized prospective trial comparing two supraglottic

airway devices: i-gel™and LMA-Supreme™in paralyzed patients.

Can J Anaesth 2014; 61: 794–800

Cook TM, Cranshaw J. Randomized crossover comparison of

ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway with Laryngeal Tube Sonda

during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth

; 95: 261–6

Kristensen MS, Teoh WH, Asai T. Which supraglottic

airway will serve my patient best? Anaesthesia 2014; 69:

–92

Alexiev V, Ochana A, Abdelrahman D, et al. Comparison of

the Baska® mask with the single-use laryngeal mask airway

in low-risk female patients undergoing ambulatory surgery.

Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 1026–32

Ramachandran SK, Mathis MR, Tremper KK, Shanks AM,

Kheterpal S. Predictors and clinical outcomes from failed

Laryngeal Mask Airway UniqueTM: a study of 15,795 patients.

Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 1217–26

Saito T, LiuW, ChewSTH, Ti LK. Incidence of and risk factors

for difficult ventilation via a supraglottic airway device in a

population of 14 480 patients from South-East Asia.

Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 1079–83

Howath A, Brimacombe J, Keller C. Gum-elastic bougieguided

insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a

new technique. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002; 30: 624–7

Taneja S, Agarwalt M, Dali JS, Agrawal G. Ease of Proseal Laryngeal

Mask Airway insertion and its fibreoptic view after

placement using Gum Elastic Bougie: a comparison with

conventional techniques. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37:

–40

Brimacombe J, Keller C, Judd DV. Gum elastic bougie-guided

insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to

the digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology

; 100: 25–9

El Beheiry H, Wong J, Nair G, et al. Improved esophageal patency

when inserting the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway

with an Eschmann tracheal tube introducer. Can J Anaesth

; 56: 725–32

Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M,

Stadlbauer KH, Keller C. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion

of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to

the digital and introducer tool techniques in patients with

simulated difficult laryngoscopy using a rigid neck collar.

Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 1253–6

Gasteiger L, Brimacombe J, Perkhofer D, Kaufmann M,

Keller C. Comparison of guided insertion of the LMA ProSeal

vs the i-gel? Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 913–6

Halaseh BK, Sukkar ZF, Hassan LH, Sia AT, Bushnaq WA,

Adarbeh H. The use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in caesarean

section—experience in 3000 cases. Anaesth Intensive

Care 2010; 38: 1023–8

Proseal LMA Instruction Manual. Available from https://

www.lmana.com/viewifu.php?ifu=19 (accessed 1 August

Caponas G. Intubating laryngeal mask airway. Anaesth

Intensive Care 2002; 30: 551–69

Ferson DZ, Rosenblatt WH, Johansen MJ, Osborn I,

Ovassapian A. Use of the intubating LMA-Fastrach in 254 patients

with difficult-to-manage airways. Anesthesiology 2001;

: 1175–81

Pandit JJ, MacLachlan K, Dravid RM, Popat MT. Comparison

of times to achieve tracheal intubation with three techniques

using the laryngeal or intubating laryngeal mask airway.

Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 128–32

Joo HS, Kapoor S, Rose DK, Naik VN. The intubating laryngeal

mask airway after induction of general anesthesia versus

awake fiberoptic intubation in patients with difficult

airways. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 1342–6

Ruxton L. Fatal accident enquiry 15 into the death of Mr Gordon

Ewing. 2010. Glasgow: April. Available from https://

www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2010FAI15.html (accessed

April 2014)

Halwagi AE, Massicotte N, Lallo A, et al. Tracheal intubation

through the I-gel™ supraglottic airway versus the LMA Fastrach

™: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2012;

: 152–6

Theiler L, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Urwyler N, Graf T, Luyet C,

Greif R. Randomized clinical trial of the i-gel™ and Magill

tracheal tube or single-use ILMA™ and ILMA™ tracheal

tube for blind intubation in anaesthetized patients with a

predicted difficult airway. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 243–50

Bakker EJ, Valkenburg M, Galvin EM. Pilot study of the air-Q

intubating laryngeal airway in clinical use. Anaesth Intensive

Care 2010; 38: 346–8

McAleavey F, Michalek P. Aura-i laryngeal mask as a conduit

for elective fibreoptic intubation. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 1151

| Frerk et al.

Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on February 7, 2016

Danha RF, Thompson JL, Popat MT, Pandit JJ. Comparison of

fibreoptic-guided orotracheal intubation through classic

and single-use laryngeal mask airways. Anaesthesia 2005;

: 184–8

Campbell J, Michalek P, Deighan M. I-gel supraglottic airway

for rescue airway management and as a conduit for tracheal

intubation in a patient with acute respiratory failure.

Resuscitation 2009; 80: 963

Wong DT, Yang JJ, Mak HY, Jagannathan N. Use of intubation

introducers through a supraglottic airway to facilitate tracheal

intubation: a brief review. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59:

–15

Shimizu M, Yoshikawa N, Yagi Y, et al. [Fiberoptic-guided

tracheal intubation through the i-gel supraglottic airway].

Masui 2014; 63: 841–5

Kleine-Brueggeney M, Theiler L, Urwyler N, Vogt A, Greif R.

Randomized trial comparing the i-gel™ and Magill tracheal

tube with the single-use ILMA™ and ILMA™ tracheal tube

for fibreoptic-guided intubation in anaesthetized patients

with a predicted difficult airway. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 251–7

DarlongV, BiyaniG, BaidyaDK, Pandey R, Punj J. Air-Q blocker:

a novel supraglottic airway device for patients with difficult

airway and risk of aspiration. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol

; 30: 589–90

Ott T, Fischer M, Limbach T, Schmidtmann I, Piepho T,

Noppens RR. The novel intubating laryngeal tube (iLTS-D)

is comparable to the intubating laryngeal mask (Fastrach)

– a prospective randomised manikin study. Scand J Trauma

Resusc Emerg Med 2015; 23: 44

Atherton DP, O’Sullivan E, Lowe D, Charters P. Aventilationexchange

bougie for fibreoptic intubations with the laryngeal

mask airway. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 1123–6

Fibreoptic guided tracheal intubation through aintree intubation

catheter. Available from http://www.das.uk.com/

guidelines/other/fibreoptic-guided-tracheal-intubationthrough-

sad-using-aintree-intubation-catheter (accessed

July 2015)

Berkow LC, Schwartz JM, Kan K, Corridore M, Heitmiller ES.

Use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway-Aintree Intubating Catheter-

fiberoptic bronchoscope technique for difficult intubation.

J Clin Anesth 2011; 23: 534–9

Cook TM, Silsby J, Simpson TP. Airway rescue in acute upper

airway obstruction using a ProSeal Laryngeal mask airway

and an Aintree Catheter: a review of the ProSeal Laryngeal

mask airway in the management of the difficult airway.

Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 1129–36

Cook TM, Seller C, Gupta K, Thornton M, O’Sullivan E. Nonconventional

uses of the Aintree Intubating Catheter in

management of the difficult airway. Anaesthesia 2007; 62:

–74

Izakson A, Cherniavsky G, Lazutkin A, Ezri T. The i-gel as a

conduit for the Aintree intubation catheter for subsequent

fiberoptic intubation Case description. Rom J Anaesth

Intensive Care 2014; 21: 131–3

Van Zundert TC, Wong DT, Van Zundert AA. The LMA-SupremeTM

as an intubation conduit in patients with known

difficult airways: a prospective evaluation study. Acta

Anaesthesiol Scand 2013; 57: 77–81

Greenland KB, Tan H, Edwards M. Intubation via a laryngeal

mask airway with an Aintree catheter - not all laryngeal

masks are the same. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 966–7

Baker PA, Flanagan BT, Greenland KB, et al. Equipment to

manage a difficult airway during anaesthesia. Anaesth

Intensive Care 2011; 39: 16–34

Michael Harmer. The Case of Elaine Bromiley. Available

from http://www.chfg.org/resources/07_qrt04/Anonymous_

Report_Verdict_and_Corrected_Timeline_Oct07.pdf (accessed

April 2015)

Desforges JCW, McDonnell NJ. Sugammadex in the management

of a failed intubation in a morbidly obese patient.

Anaesth Intensive Care 2011; 39: 763–4

Mendonca C. Sugammadex to rescue a ‘can’t ventilate’ scenario

in an anticipated difficult intubation: is it the answer?

Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 795–9

Barbosa FT, da Cunha RM. Reversal of profound neuromuscular

blockade with sugammadex after failure of rapid sequence

endotracheal intubation: a case report. Rev Bras

Anestesiol 2012; 62: 281–4

Curtis RP. Persistent ‘can’t intubate, can’t oxygenate’ crisis

despite reversal of rocuronium with sugammadex: the importance

of timing. Anaesth Intensive Care 2012; 40: 722

Langvad S, Hyldmo PK, Nakstad AR, Vist GE, Sandberg M.

Emergency cricothyrotomy – a systematic review. Scand J

Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2013; 21: 43

Heard A. Percutaneous Emergency Oxygenation Strategies

in the ‘Can’t Intubate, Can’t Oxygenate’ Scenario. Smashworks

Editions; 2013. Available from https://www.smash

words.com/books/view/377530 (accessed 5 January 2014)

Lockey D, Crewdson K, Weaver A, Davies G. Observational

study of the success rates of intubation and failed intubation

airway rescue techniques in 7256 attempted intubations

of trauma patients by pre-hospital physicians. Br J

Anaesth 2014; 113: 220–5

Mabry RL, Nichols MC, Shiner DC, Bolleter S, Frankfurt A. A

comparison of two open surgical cricothyroidotomy techniques

by military medics using a cadaver model. Ann Emerg

Med 2014; 63: 1–5

Pugh HE, LeClerc S, Mclennan J. A review of pre-admission

advanced airway management in combat casualties, Helmand

Province 2013. J R Army Med Corps 2015; 161: 121–6

Howes TE, Lobo CA, Kelly FE, Cook TM. Rescuing the obese or

burned airway: are conventional training manikins adequate?

A simulation study. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114: 136–42

Kristensen MS, Teoh WH, Baker PA. Percutaneous emergency

airway access; prevention, preparation, technique

and training. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114: 357–61

Hamaekers AE, Henderson JJ. Equipment and strategies for

emergency tracheal access in the adult patient. Anaesthesia

; 66: 65–80

Crewdson K, Lockey DJ. Needle, knife, or device – which

choice in an airway crisis? Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med

; 21: 49

Wong DT, Prabhu AJ, Coloma M, Imasogie N, Chung FF.What

is the minimumtraining required for successful cricothyroidotomy?

A study in mannequins. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:

–53

Hubert V, Duwat A, Deransy R, Mahjoub Y, Dupont H. Effect

of simulation training on compliance with difficult airway

management algorithms, technical ability, and skills retention

for emergency cricothyrotomy. Anesthesiology 2014; 120:

–1008

Hubble MW, Wilfong DA, Brown LH, Hertelendy A,

Benner RW. A meta-analysis of prehospital airway control

techniques part II: alternative airway devices and cricothyrotomy

success rates. Prehosp Emerg Care 2010; 14: 515–30

Baker PA,Weller JM, Greenland KB, Riley RH, Merry AF. Education

in airway management. Anaesthesia 2011; 66(Suppl 2):

–11

Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines | 847

Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on February 7, 2016

Mabry RL. An analysis of battlefield cricothyrotomy in Iraq

and Afghanistan. J Spec Oper Med 2012; 12: 17–23

Levitan RM. Cricothyrotomy | Airway Cam - Airway Management

Education and Training. Available from http://www.

airwaycam.com/cricothyrotomy (accessed 4 August 2015)

Airway and ventilatory management. In: Douglas P, ed.

ATLS® Guidelines 9th Ed Kindle edition. Chicago: The

American College of Surgeons, 2012

Brofeldt BT, Panacek EA, Richards JR. An easy cricothyrotomy

approach: the rapid four-step technique. Acad Emerg

Med 1996; 3: 1060–3

Ross-Anderson DJ, Ferguson C, Patel A. Transtracheal jet

ventilation in 50 patients with severe airway compromise

and stridor. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 140–4

Bourgain JL. Transtracheal high frequency jet ventilation for

endoscopic airway surgery: a multicentre study. Br J Anaesth

; 87: 870–5

Craven RM, Vanner RG. Ventilation of a model lung using

various cricothyrotomy devices. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 595–9

Heard A. Instructor Check-lists for Percutaneous Emergency

Oxygenation Strategies in the ‘Can’t Intubate, Can’t Oxygenate’

Scenario 2014.Available fromhttps://www.smashwords.

com/books/view/494739 (accessed 23 April 2015)

Heard AMB, Green RJ, Eakins P. The formulation and introduction

of a ‘can’t intubate, can’t ventilate’ algorithm into

clinical practice. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 601–8

Melker JS, Gabrielli A. Melker Cricothyrotomy Kit: an alternative

to the surgical technique. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

; 114: 525–8

Kristensen MS, Teoh WH, Rudolph SS, et al. Structured approach

to ultrasound-guided identification of the cricothyroid

membrane: a randomized comparison with the

palpation method in the morbidly obese. Br J Anaesth 2015;

: 1003–4

Kleine-Brueggeney M, Greif R, Ross S, et al. Ultrasoundguided

percutaneous tracheal puncture: a computer-tomographic

controlled study in cadavers. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106:

–42

Dinsmore J, Heard AMB, Green RJ. The use of ultrasound to

guide time-critical cannula tracheotomy when anterior

neck airway anatomy is unidentifiable. Eur J Anaesthesiol

; 28: 506–10

Mallin M, Curtis K, Dawson M, Ockerse P, Ahern M. Accuracy

of ultrasound-guided marking of the cricothyroid membrane

before simulated failed intubation. Am J Emerg Med

; 32: 61–3

World Alliance for Patient Safety. WHO Guidelines for Safe

Surgery. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008

Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, et al. Practice guidelines

for management of the difficult airway: an updated report

by theAmerican Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force

on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2013;

: 251–70

Feinleib J, Foley L, Mark L. What we all should know about

our patient’s airway: difficult airway communications, database

registries, and reporting systems registries. Anesthesiol

Clin 2015; 33: 397–413

Hagberg C, Georgi R, Krier C. Complications of managing the

airway. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2005; 19: 641–59

Domino KB, Posner KL, Caplan RA, Cheney FW. Airway injury

during anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. J Am Soc

Anesthesiol 1999; 91: 1703

Woodall NM, Harwood RJ, Barker GL. Complications of

awake fibreoptic intubation without sedation in 200 healthy

anaesthetists attending a training course. Br J Anaesth 2008;

: 850–5

Gamlin F, Caldicott LD, Shah MV. Mediastinitis and sepsis

syndrome following intubation. Anaesthesia 1994; 49:

–5

Barron FA, Ball DR, Jefferson P, Norrie J. ‘Airway Alerts’.

How UK anaesthetists organise, document and communicate

difficult airway management. Anaesthesia 2003; 58:

–7

Mellado PF, Thunedborg LP, Swiatek F, Kristensen MS. Anaesthesiological

airway management in Denmark: assessment,

equipment and documentation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand

; 48: 350–4

Wilkes M, Beattie C, Gardner C, McNarry AF. Difficult airway

communication between anaesthetists and general practitioners.

Scott Med J 2013; 58: 2–6

Baker P, Moore C, Hopley L, Herzer K, Mark L. How do anaesthetists

in New Zealand disseminate critical airway information?

Anaesth Intensive Care 2013; 41: 334–41

Difficult Airway Society. Airway Alert Form. Available

from http://www.das.uk.com/guidelines/airwayalert.html

(accessed 4 August 2015)

Liban JB. Medic Alert UK should start new section for patients

with a difficult airway. Br Med J 1996; 313: 425

Medical Alert. Available from https://www.medicalert.org.

uk/ (accessed 4 August 2015)

Banks IC. The application of Read Codes to anaesthesia.

Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 324–7

Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, et al. The difficult airway

with recommendations for management – Part 1 – Intubation

encountered in an unconscious/induced patient. Can

J Anaesth 2013; 60: 1089–118

Teoh WHL, Shah MK, Sia ATH. Randomised comparison of

Pentax AirwayScope and Glidescope for tracheal intubation

in patients with normal airway anatomy. Anaesthesia 2009;

: 1125–9

Hoshijima H, Kuratani N, Hirabayashi Y, Takeuchi R, Shiga T,

Masaki E. Pentax Airway Scope® vs Macintosh laryngoscope

for tracheal intubation in adult patients: a systematic review

and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 911–8

Behringer EC, Cooper RM, Luney S, Osborn IP. The comparative

study of video laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope:

defining proficiency is critical. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012;

: 158–9

Behringer EC, Kristensen MS. Evidence for benefit vs novelty

in new intubation equipment. Anaesthesia 2011; 66(Suppl 2):

–64

The Royal College of Anaesthetists CPD Matrix. Available

from http://www.rcoa.ac.uk/document-store/cpd-matrix

(accessed 4 August 2015)

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.




Copyright (c)